Articles Plus BZLA.info

The following article presents the very latest information on Productivity. If you have a particular interest in Productivity, then this informative article is required reading.

Productivity is basically defined as the measure of ?the output from a production process per unit of input?. In labor, for example, it is typically a measure of ?output per labor-hour.?

One area of great concern to industrialists and capitalists is related to labor productivity and the impact of the many factors around it ? workplace practices, the advent of computers, capital infusion, education and training, and many others.

The main reason is the fact that while the impact of human capital investments on the workers’ wages had been studied extensively, there had been little information on the direct effect of human capital on productivity.

Labor productivity

To date, however, there had been new studies conducted and published. These studies examined the link between labor productivity and a variety of workplace practices, capital and computers, both in the manufacturing and non-manufacturing sectors.

In the conducted studies, the other issues factored in included the size and age of the business, material inputs, capital stock, workers’ experience, and capacity utilization.

Findings

The studies were done to check the factors that determine labor productivity for a given period, the size of capital stocks needed for material use, the equipments, and the workplace practices. They also included computer use, human capital investments, high performance work systems, profit sharing, and recruitment practices.

One standout data, however, showed that increasing the educational level of employees by at least a year increases productivity as well. (8.5% in manufacturing and 13% in the non-manufacturing sector)

Training and decision-making

It demonstrated that formal training (done offsite, meaning from schools etc.) increased productivity in manufacturing. Computer savvy also enhanced productivity, especially in the non-manufacturing sector (sales, services, etc).

It seems like new information is discovered about something every day. And the topic of Productivity is no exception. Keep reading to get more fresh news about Productivity.

Other findings include that unionization or employee participation in decision-making also raised productivity. Also, it was found out that TQM (total quality management) system did not have much significant effects on productivity.

Rather, it was raising the proportion of workers in making decisions in the work place (regular meetings, etc.) that showed a positive impact on labor productivity.

Profit-sharing

In manufacturing plants with profit-sharing schemes for non-managerial workers, there was a 7% higher labor productivity shown compared with their competitors in the same field. Those with R & D (research and development) had an average 6% increase.

In effect, the studies showed that profit-sharing extended to non-managerial employees had increased productivity more than what the profit-sharing scheme with managerial workers did. Benchmarking also raised labor productivity by 6%.

Computers

To date, computers have also played a significant role in productivity increase (12% output) compared in the 80′s when equipment investments accounted for 7% output growth.

Investments in computers and other IT equipments were about 1/3 of total investments in the 90s.

Investments

All in all, investments in education and training generate higher productivity. Moreover, it promoted higher wage growth. Studies had shown that raising the workers’ educational level resulted in around 8 to 13% higher labor productivity

It had been found that investments in computer training (especially in the non-manufacturing group) resulted in higher productivity (and wages) of employees. Workers who use computers are paid 15% more than their counterparts who don’t.

However, the remaining challenge is to enable more workers equipped with skills to allow them access to better jobs. In such a scenario, they can enjoy a higher standard of living as well as contribute to higher productivity growth.

I hope that reading the above information was both enjoyable and educational for you. Your learning process should be ongoing–the more you understand about any subject, the more you will be able to share with others.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, proud owner of this top ranked web hosting reseller site: GVO

Productivity, defined as a measure of the amount of output per hour of work, is shown to be typically pro-cyclical. This means that productivity increases during economic upswings and slows down (or even declines) when the economy is in a downturn.

Several causes have been forwarded to sustain this. One declares that labor and capital inputs are worked harder during boom times than in busts. Another observation pronounces that the reallocation of resources to more productive activities is faster when the economy grows rapidly than when it slows down.

Pro-cyclical exceptions

For 2009, productivity growth was expected to slow down further in many countries. However, there appeared to be some exceptions to the pro-cyclicality of labor productivity.

The experiences of the United States and Europe are two examples reflecting this economic wrinkle. Compared side by side, striking differences are evident between these two regions in terms of the productivity growth rates with which they entered the current recession.

For the long period of 2000-2008, labor productivity in the United States increased at 2% against 1.5% in the European Union. (The 1.1% figure is even much smaller in the original EU-15 member states that exclude the new member states from Central and Eastern Europe.)

These differences reflect a more efficient use of capital, labor, and other sources of growth in the United States. The most recent productivity advances of the U.S. have been realized, however, through rapid layoffs. This further suggests that the productivity of the remaining workers and firms is actually strengthening.

Traditional productivity growth rates

So far, we’ve uncovered some interesting facts about Productivity. You may decide that the following information is even more interesting.

During the run-up of 2008, the Euro Area showed a surprisingly weak productivity growth (below 1%). This was attributed to the large increases in employment coming from a relatively large labor reserve pool.

In the same quarter, output and productivity growth rates in the Euro Area turned negative following the traditional pattern that employment growth does not adjust as quickly to a deteriorating economy in Europe as it does in the U.S.

Presently, productivity growth rates in advanced economies are falling below historical structural productivity trends. These represent the rate where productivity can grow.

To get back to the structural growth trend, an increased productivity through investment in new capital and innovation is needed – and not just through cost-cutting of the current resource base.

This would comprise investments in technological change and innovation, skill and performance level of the labor force, and all the organizational intangibles (management and workplace practices, organizational structure, ICT applications and human resource strategies).

Given the current constrained economic climate, all these are big challenges. Added to this is the expectation that high productivity growth rates also imply greater efficiency of resources once the economic environment improves.

Productivity growth will also translate into high levels of output per hour. These higher productivity levels will also reflect the presence of a strong resource base in terms of human and physical capital per worker.

When maintained during the downturn, they will provide the firms with the means to more easily innovate themselves out of the recession resulting in a better resurgent productivity growth.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, feel free to visit his top ranked GVO affiliate site: GVO

Productivity, as it is commonly understood, means many things in many other different fields. Even in business where it has its nearest relations, productivity is defined variously according to the aspect that is studied. (Reportedly, there are around 20 definitions of productivity related to business.)

Productivity concepts

Most of these concepts relate to productivity as a relationship between output and input to the studied systems. It contains variables and other inter-relationships within the precise group it belongs to (office, manufacturing plant, machinery systems, etc).

It is also regarded as a stimulus-response model that an input causes an output. Universally, for purposes of simplicity, it is output divided by input. However, there is some confusion to this view.

Formally, in most circles productivity is ?strictly a relationship between resources that come into an organizational system over a given period of time and outputs generated with those resources over the same period of time.?

Variables

In a factory, for example, productivity measures connected with input factors (labor, capital, etc) are inadequate and can be misleading sometimes.

On one hand, input factors cannot be studied while isolated by themselves. Productivity improvement in one aspect is generally at the cost of the other. Also, labor as an input factor is present in all phases. On the other hand, managerial resource (another important input factor) is not counted in such measures.

However, the rest of the many concepts consign productivity in an output-input relationship, mostly relevant to a production system. This implies that there is an organization that works as a physical system with variables and other inter-relationships within.

Objectives

Experts Sardina and Vrat declared that those who will undertake productivity measurements should have three objectives.

You may not consider everything you just read to be crucial information about Productivity. But don’t be surprised if you find yourself recalling and using this very information in the next few days.

One, potential improvements must be identified. Two, a decision must be made to reallocate resources. And three, it should present how well the previously established goals were determined.

Performance and financial productivity

There is a difference between these two factors. Performance productivity is based on the number of produced outputs.

For example: company X had produced 100 units of products in one week, and in the next, was able to come with 120 units. The performance productivity would have increased by 20%.

In comparison, the focus on the output value is grouped as a financial productivity. Suppose that company X had produced 100 units of products in the first and second week.

However, the selling price was raised from $1.00 to $1.20 per unit in the second week. The financial productivity would have been increased by 20% but with no increase in output.

This is misleading, too. If, on the other hand, the company sells 120 product items at $1.20 each but in the second week the price is dropped by 16.7%, the result is still $120 in sales.

From a financial viewpoint, there is no change while from a performance point there had been change. (They had to produce 20 more items.)

Definitions

Thus far, managers cannot pinpoint productivity’s definitions, measurements and improvements. On the same vein, they cannot define the performance’s concepts, measurements, and improvements as well.

This demonstrates that there might be a number of perspectives in viewing productivity. Following that viewpoint, there could also be a number of different measures in assessing productivity.

Now you can be a confident expert on Productivity. OK, maybe not an expert. But you should have something to bring to the table next time you join a discussion on Productivity.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, proud owner of this top ranked web hosting reseller site: GVO

The following paragraphs summarize the work of Productivity experts who are completely familiar with all the aspects of Productivity. Heed their advice to avoid any Productivity surprises.

Because of the problems that come along the way, it is oftentimes hard for a person to maintain a certain level of productivity. This is because more often than not, that person would only experience failure because he or she wasn’t able to meet the goals and expectations that are set.

Despite the discouraging times, experts say that this not enough reason not to be productive. In fact, for many people, this can be a good opportunity to start anew. Studies show that hard times like these can serve as an inspiration to motivate a person to be productive.

When one learns the concept of productivity, that person will be equipped to overcome difficulties and triumph over life’s adversities. When practiced religiously, productivity can help people learn lifelong lessons and use these to live a good and contented life.

How to be productive

You may not consider everything you just read to be crucial information about Productivity. But don’t be surprised if you find yourself recalling and using this very information in the next few days.

Experts say that it is only common for people to feel depression, anxiety and defeat if life has been giving them so many tests and trials. However, instead of feeling depresses and sulking into the taste of defeat, people can use this as an opportunity to make themselves stronger. This is by using these emotions and experiences to increase their productivity.

Productivity is indeed one of the best ways to live a good life. This is because if one is productive, he or she can set goals that are within his or her reach. He or she can also find ways to deal with defeats without having to feel anxious or depressed over something that may be beyond his or her control.

To be productive, it is best if one never stops learning. Experts say that once people realize that life is never-ending journey to learning, they will be able to find ways to their successes. To increase productivity, it is best never to stop learning because this opens up to new worlds of possibilities that are waiting to be explored. If one continues learning through read or by trying different things, he or she can gain more confidence to do things and start with new projects. Also, when one continues learning, he or she will acquire newer skills that can add up to the things that he or she can do.

Having a positive outlook in life is also aids success in life. Seeing things in a positive light might seem easy for some people but many people are having a hard time in appreciating the brighter side of life. Maybe because people just have different personalities and different upbringing that affect the way they see life in general.

If one wants to increase productivity, he or she must start developing a positive outlook in life. This can be done by trying to see the good in bad at all times or whenever possible. If people are able to overcome these kinds of obstacles, he or she would soon develop the habit of looking for ways that would help him or her overcome that problem and will be able to succeed in life.

The day will come when you can use something you read about here to have a beneficial impact. Then you’ll be glad you took the time to learn more about Productivity.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, feel free to visit his top ranked GVO affiliate site: GVO

When you’re learning about something new, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the sheer amount of relevant information available. This informative article should help you focus on the central points.

As defined, physical productivity is the quantity of output produced by one unit of production input in a unit of time. In layman’s terms, it could be an equipment which can produce 10 tons of output per hour.

Economic productivity, on the other hand, is the value of output acquired from one unit of input. For example, if a worker produces an output of 2 units in an hour (with a price of $10 each), his productivity is $20.

Both technological and market elements (output quantities and prices, respectively) interact with one another to determine economic productivity.

Calculations

One gets the average economic productivity by dividing output value and (time or physical) units of input. In addition, if the production process uses only one factor (labor, for example), the procedure gives the productivity name of that factor. (In this case, labor productivity).

If there is more than one input used for each factor, it is possible to compute by the same procedure its productivity. (In this case, it is termed ?partial?.)

Total factor productivity tries to construct a productivity measure that will encompass an aggregation of factors. How it means is still under hypotheses, and therefore, not yet assured in a general framework.

Indicators

To date, it had been determined by current technology that the maximum physical quantity of output can be reached together with the number and quality of inputs needed.

In turn, adopted technology is an economic choice. Today’s wide array of concurrent technologies is influenced by available innovations and compatibility with the adopter.
Most cannot be reversed because of the high cost of switching.

If you base what you do on inaccurate information, you might be unpleasantly surprised by the consequences. Make sure you get the whole Productivity story from informed sources.

Technology

Technological changes sometimes happen fast in some industries while in many others the changes are more gradual. Technology, however, always improves.

Economic productivity will depend on pricing and demand. If the consumers require less products that can be produced potentially, plants will not work at full productive capacity. Economic productivity can fall together with decreasing demands and prices.

At the macro-economic level, labor productivity (GDP per worker) depends on the corresponding dynamics of two factors: GDP and employment. In short, productivity rises if the GDP (gross domestic product) increases faster than employment.

Productivity increase

Many factors help buoy up productivity increase. They include capital accumulation via investments, dissemination of new technologies, domestic innovative efforts, enhanced division of work, higher levels of education, organizational and technological production modes from world-class models, and the development of physical and social infrastructures,

Impacts of productivity increase

Higher productivity will first make its presence on profits and ultimately on people’s wages. If production costs do not exceed productivity increase, there is a possibility of a price fall or stability. It is also conducive to lower inflation.

In other countries, productivity has grown. In rich countries, GDP soared mainly because of the increase in productivity. The poorest countries in the world are typically with a low productivity increase.

So far, there is a marked inter-relationship between increase productivity and the rise of GDP at all levels: country-wide, companies, organizational groups, even down to the individual himself.

That’s how things stand right now. Keep in mind that any subject can change over time, so be sure you keep up with the latest news.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, proud owner of this top ranked web hosting reseller site: GVO

For an economic component so vital, productivity needs to be measured. The data gathered shall in turn be used in calculating the other economic components for an accurate reading.

The famous Peter Drucker is more to the point: ?Without productivity objectives, a business does not have direction. Without productivity measurement, it does not have control.?

Data-gathering

Collecting data is an essential requirement in measurement. The three basic ways of collecting data on a phenomenon or system are inquiry, observation and documentation.

Afterwards, the basics are done ? the outputs are evaluated against the inputs. Some writers put in some qualitative indicators which create problems, although the rest confine the discussion of productivity to simple O/I (output and input) factors.

Some of the productivity measurement techniques are the following.

Mundel (1989)

Mundel created a computer software package that evaluates productivity. In it, direct adjustments for quality are excluded as well as raw materials. This is because the result is knowledge.

Here, productivity is calculated using simple O/I algorithms. It presents eight levels of work units, from the lowest-motion up to highest-results-achieved because of outputs.

Sassone (1991)

The technique used by Sassone is simple to implement. Work is classified by the lowest level of employee. Work is then recorded by the type. Finally, data is compiled in a matrix format and analyzed.

If you don’t have accurate details regarding Productivity, then you might make a bad choice on the subject. Don’t let that happen: keep reading.

The matrix shows the amount of effort expended by each employee type, and whether they are working above or below their level, indicating a mix of workers in a work group.
It also shows the consequences of common assumptions like cutting support staff can actually reduce costs.

Sink (1985)

Sink has several techniques in evaluating productivity using mainly his three main methodologies. One is a computerized mode of measurement based strictly on O/I (output/input).

The second one use structured group processes in measuring white-collar or knowledge workers. It uses the group technique to establish consensus about what and how productivity should be measured.

The third system is designed to evaluate various productivity measures and decide which are the most important. It also allows the combining of dissimilar productivity measures.

Other techniques

There were other researchers who use the group technique. Bernard (1986) used project teams and stressed maximizing diversity with the premise that managers cannot be assumed to know what really is going on.

Thor (1990) also dealt with group techniques. These include a participatory style, with each group having a facilitator who should be familiar with the technique but at the same time relatively unknown to the group.

A methodology that depended on estimation was used by Kristakis (1984). The manager lists down the types of work in the group, and breaks them down into detailed operations. The manager will then estimate how long each work process takes.

Time diaries, estimates, work samplings and direct observations are some of the tools employed by Anthony (1984). The gathered data are analyzed by a computer, and reviewed to eliminate insignificant items.

All in all, each of these other techniques of productivity measurements has their good points worth taking a look. Most are saddled, however, with inaccuracies and some were outdated. Nevertheless, all are in one opinion that there is a need to measure productivity.

Of course, it’s impossible to put everything about Productivity into just one article. But you can’t deny that you’ve just added to your understanding about Productivity, and that’s time well spent.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, feel free to visit his top ranked GVO affiliate site: GVO

As a component of total productivity, the growth of labor productivity is one important marker in determining the rise or fall of overall economic growth. As of the present, however, labor productivity is simply another statistic number reported in government agencies.

The interest in this number is hinged only on the belief that it is related to a number of things important to economists and government policy-makers. It is thought to be connected to overall economic growth, real per capita income growth, and inflation.

Economic growth

Labor productivity growth and overall economic growth are definitely relevant to one another. By definition, the sum of growth of labor hours plus labor productivity growth is the output growth. (Higher labor productivity growth means higher output growth.)

Longer time periods make this relationship clear. For instance, output growth slowed down in the 70s and 80s as labor productivity growth slowed down. When labor productivity improved in the 90s, the output growth also rebounded.

However, there were time periods when these two were at variance. Experts think this is caused by business cycle forces affecting the demand and supply of labor. The swings in the quantity of labor affect the productivity fluctuations.

Per capita income growth

Economic textbooks declare that productivity growth and real wages growth are equal. By this assertion, it would seem that productivity growth is equal to the growth of real per capita income.

In real terms, this is not exactly correct.

Knowledge can give you a real advantage. To make sure you’re fully informed about Productivity, keep reading.

There are several reasons for the variance. One, there is a multiplicity of produced goods. There is also a divergence between output price deflator used to compute productivity and consumer product price used in computing real incomes.

In addition, there is slippage between growth in wages per hour and growth in income per capita. This is caused by fluctuations in unemployment, labor force participation, and working hours per person.

Inflation

One question posed by experts is the following: If productivity growth is inherently a real phenomenon and inflation is a monetary phenomenon, why is there a relationship?

One possibility they had looked into is that higher inflation rates could distort the price mechanism. In turn, it could trigger reduced efficiency throughout the economy. Inflation may have a negative effect on capital accumulation.

The opposite could also be true. In periods of fast outputs and real income growth, it is easier for monetary authorities to impose anti-inflationary rules.

So far, the economists are not yet clear on any stable relations between inflation and either capital formation and technological change. By the same token, it is argued that inflation and productivity could be unrelated.

Nevertheless, the data are clear in showing links between productivity growth and inflation. It is shown that at longer intervals, the magnitude of their relationship grows. It seems that periods of high productivity growth are periods of lower inflation.

The interpretation by economists on the correlations between productivity and output, real per capita income and inflation are further clouded by other economic factors. Further studies are still to be done.

However, one thing is evident. Labor productivity growth is not just a statistic number but an important component in total economic growth as seen even from a layman’s point of view.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, feel free to visit his top ranked GVO affiliate site: GVO

The following article includes pertinent information that may cause you to reconsider what you thought you understood. The most important thing is to study with an open mind and be willing to revise your understanding if necessary.

Your home life is probably the most important aspect of your life. It could be the front to all the other aspects of your well-being. That is why it is important that you keep it cozy. The home life could be greatly improved by being organized. For skeptics the idea could be really absurd, but for experts and home buddies, it really makes sense. Productivity should be maintained even while you are home.

Maintaining organization or keeping organized at home is very important because the home is where your sanctuary is. If the home is totally messy, chances are, your time for rest and relaxation would be affected and you would end up totally messed up. You still need to do a lot of necessary activities at home. Thus, productivity is still a necessity in this important place. You need to be productive so you could accomplish many tasks that pertains to your children and to your hobbies. You might also have home-based earning activities for extra income.

Organizing the home could be tedious. It could entail becoming meticulous. The home should be maintained and properly kept for coziness and productivity. Organization is one thing most people really are not good enough at, but if they only try, they would be surprised at how they could complete necessary tasks. Organizing your home life is something you should do and it should be started not tomorrow or the other day, but today.

Procrastination is never useful. It is a hamper to productivity. Inability to move freely, quickly, and comfortably could also prevent productivity at home. There are practical ways to organize your home life and improve productivity.

You may not consider everything you just read to be crucial information about Productivity. But don’t be surprised if you find yourself recalling and using this very information in the next few days.

Make an organizer. It could be in the form of a calendar or you could keep a small board for it. The organizer sorts your schedule. It is assumed that you are also busy at work. Maintaining a balance between work life and family life is hard. Organizers must contain all the dates and appointments you have (at home and at work), so there would be no engagements to be missed out.

The refrigerator could be a message board between family members. But be sure to sort out the notes on the fridge door. Throw out those that are already not applicable so the ref door would not look like a replica of your cluttered office desk.

Maintain or keep regular time for children and family. For example, set Sunday as a day for activities with them. Make it a regular or a tradition that you and your family meet out and have fun together during the day. There should be time for work and for family fun. Enjoyment and winding up could somehow help bolster your overall productivity.

Clean the house regularly. De-clutter the home of all the unnecessary and non-useful equipment and materials that only tend to pile up and consume precious space. This way, people around the house would be given ample movement space to roam around and move more freely. If you are doing house tasks, you could observe that having more space could be an effective way to achieve higher productivity at home.

That’s the latest from the Productivity authorities. Once you’re familiar with these ideas, you’ll be ready to move to the next level.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, proud owner of this top ranked web hosting reseller site: GVO

So what is Productivity really all about? The following report includes some fascinating information about Productivity–info you can use, not just the old stuff they used to tell you.

The year 1970 saw the publication of two books, Kuznets’ ?Economic Growth of Nations? and Solow’s Economic Growth? in 1971. Unwittingly, it marked the start of a rare professional consensus on economic growth.

In his book, Kuznets summarized his decades of empirical research. Solow’s work meanwhile contained his own summary of his decades of theoretical research.

Solow’s theory, Kuznets empirical studies

For the economists, Solow’s neo-classical theory of economic growth, especially his analysis of steady states with constant rates of growth, provided conceptual clarity and sophistication.

Kuznets, for his part, quantified the long sweep of historical experience of the United States and 13 other developed economies. He combined this with quantitative comparisons among developed and developing economies during the postwar period.

Same topic

Without knowledge of each other’s work, both authors worked independently on their books without any connection from one another. Evidence of this was the total absence of cross-references between their works. Strangely, they were working on the same topic, within the same framework, and even within the same vicinity at Cambridge, Massachusetts.

After being challenged by Denison, Kuznets recognized Denison’s approach to measuring labor input and presented his own version in 1971.

You may not consider everything you just read to be crucial information about Productivity. But don’t be surprised if you find yourself recalling and using this very information in the next few days.

Solow, on the other hand, made extensive references to Denison’s findings on the growth of output and capital stock. However, he adhered to hours worked (or ?man-hours’ as it was termed in the 70s) as a measure of labor input.

Kuznets showed that ??the contribution of the factor inputs per capita was a minor fraction of the growth rate of per capita product’. According to his estimates, the contribution of increases in capital input per capita over this extensive period was negative.

Relevant to these, Tinberger in 1942 analyzed the sources of U.S. economic growth a century ago. He found that efficiency accounted for only a little more that a quarter of growth in output, while growth in capital and labor inputs accounted for the remainder.
This was precisely the opposite of the conclusion that Kuznets (1971) and Solow (1970) reached 30 years later.

Total factor productivity

The ?total factor productivity’ (or efficiency) was introduced independently by Stigler and became the starting point for a major research program at the National Bureau of Economic Research.

This program used data on output of the U.S. economy from earlier studies done by the bureau including the pioneering estimates of the national product by Kuznets.

However, much of the data was generated by Kendrick who used an explicit system of national production accounts. These include measures of output, input and productivity for national aggregates and individual industries.

In Solow’s article ?Technical Change and the Aggregate Production Function? he identified ?technical change? with shifts in the production function. Like Abramovitz, Kendrick, and Kuznets, Solow attributed almost all of U.S. economic growth to the ?residual? growth in productivity.

Kuznets later reinforced the findings of Abramovitz, Kendrick and Solow. It declared that economic growth was largely attributable to the Solow residual (productivity) between the growth of output and the growth of capital and labor inputs.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, feel free to visit his top ranked GVO affiliate site: GVO

When you’re learning about something new, it’s easy to feel overwhelmed by the sheer amount of relevant information available. This informative article should help you focus on the central points.

World business conditions notwithstanding, many companies nowadays are filled with apprehension and anxiety as to their future. Businesses are cutting back their employees’ work hours. Productivity is not only at a standstill in some places, it actually had gone down in some, too.

Some businesses had their employees take one paid day off every pay schedule. Others have their office days only from Monday to Thursday while still others shortened their work days.

Impact on productivity

There were two interesting reactions to these cost-cutting methods done by businesses. The first outcome was totally unexpected.

While there was some lost productivity because of fewer working hours and also because of the negative working environment that it created, many businesses discovered that productivity during working hours was actually higher than before the cuts were implemented.

There were two reasons forwarded as to why business productivity may be higher as a consequence of decreased hours in the work place.

The first was the employees’ perception that they have lesser time available to them to complete the same amount of work as they did before. It moved them to put extra efforts to get everything done, and worked harder than they had in the past.

Moreover, the motivation of fear was strong. People were worried that the cutbacks were just the beginning and that more layoffs were soon to follow.

In an effort to keep their jobs, the people worked harder than before to at least put on a picture that they are worth keeping as employees.

Negative motivations

Those of you not familiar with the latest on Productivity now have at least a basic understanding. But there’s more to come.

On the other hand, both of these motivating factors are unfortunately short-term situations. After the workers adapted to the shorter work hours, their stress levels decreased in regards to their perceived amount of time to get the job done.

Soon, they reverted back to their old coffee breaks and Internet surfing instead of working.

Regarding the motivation of fear, it did not take long for the working environment to become highly negative. Negativity in the office tends to decrease productivity.

Some businesses have seen more employees spending more time at the proverbial water cooler. They are griping about the fact that they do not have enough money because of the present cutbacks.

Because of the negative atmosphere around, nobody wants to contribute anymore to the overall good of the business (which decreases productivity). After the fear stopped motivating these employees, the result is lower productivity in the office.

Some suggestions

Companies that may discover themselves to be in this situation need to do some damage control on the employees’ morale. The goal would be to maintain a positive working environment.

Keep open all lines of communication with everybody. Airing things out soothe nerves and can bring back people to their ideal selves.

Make it apparent to everyone that you are all working together to get through the present difficult times. This is better than fighting each other all the time for petty things. In such a relaxed atmosphere, people tend to calm down and become their productive selves once again.

About the Author
By Anders Eriksson, proud owner of this top ranked web hosting reseller site: GVO